Re^3: Managing the fork/execing and reaping of child processes

If the fork fails, the parent dies. Is that tracking enough? I figure that if the fork fails it's going to muck things up enough that the die is proper.

Comment on Re^3: Managing the fork/execing and reaping of child processes

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Managing the fork/execing and reaping of child processes by mr_mischief (Monsignor) on Jul 16, 2015 at 19:44 UTC
Okay, let me put it this way. If one wanted to not just die and to attempt to actually deal with not being able to fork more than X children even though Y children were requested, the example would need more changes than just removing the `die()` and reporting the error. The counts would also need to be moved. So in an example program that's going to be expanded upon and altered, it may be fruitful to track those things in the proper place from the beginning.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^5: Managing the fork/execing and reaping of child processes by Anonymous Monk on Jul 16, 2015 at 19:51 UTC
If you're going to remove the die, just replace it with decrementing the counters. :)	[reply]