I of course could not realize your reality , but I use swat for a dozens web applications daily. I mean I write a new tests daily because I need this and I have time shortage, this is not artificial but real life context. This is how swat appeared . Swat by design is specially for smoke tests , no user acceptance, no UI, no Java script , no Ajax , etc, I quite ok with that there are speal tools for that ( and you know I have an experience with this too. ) But look, I talk about smoke tests , my context is quite simple - give this host a curl , check some http uri-s and that is it.
So the quality is over quantity , I agree. With swat I get qualitive smoke tests with low time price . Sure. This is proven by my experience. So why do not you try? | [reply] |
| [reply] |
Good luck to you on your way. May be I am wrong but I think swat is still might be useful for others, time will show. But last thought - smoke tests are not about specific frameworks you mentioned , this is just a way to get know that a web application is alive after deploy. There are a plenty of web servers and web frameworks but often people maintaining servers does not care/ know about the internal side , they just want to be sure that application is alive. I call it smoke tests. I respect your way, seriously, but let we close our discussion , do not you mind?
| [reply] |