in reply to Re: Memory efficiency, anonymous vs named's vs local subroutines
in thread Memory efficiency, anonymous vs named's vs local subroutines
Hello GrandFather,
First of all thank you for your time and effort reading and replying to my question. You are right, always I am getting into these stupid details. I guess I was more curious to found what function to use when. Who care for a few bytes. The important part as you said first of all, is to be able to understand what it does and then all the rest.
Thanks I guess I will go with named routines, simple as that.
Local subroutine, I call it because the author of the tutorial Creating Nested Functions was calling it like this.
|
|---|