in reply to Re: Memory efficiency, anonymous vs named's vs local subroutines
in thread Memory efficiency, anonymous vs named's vs local subroutines
Hello Laurent_R,
Thank you for your time and effort, reading and replying to my question. You are right, maintenance comes top in the list. A few Bytes or even KBytes with the resources that we have today will not make any difference. Memory leakage is something that I should be aware and careful for.
My way of moving forward would be using named functions is to understand and to implement. Small pieces of code to construct something bigger.
|
|---|