in reply to Re: SIGSEGV instead of "Not a hash ref" in destructor w/ FATAL => all
in thread SIGSEGV instead of "Not a hash ref" in destructor w/ FATAL => all

Thanks for #123398; that definitely is it.

There is a patch, and the last post there currently is about 5 weeks ago (June 8), when the bug status was switched to "pending release", which apparently means "we fixed the bug, but only in dev, and not yet in production".

I only need/want `FATAL => all` in testing, so no big deal. Just nice to know definitively what the problem is.

  • Comment on Re^2: SIGSEGV instead of "Not a hash ref" in destructor w/ FATAL => all