in reply to Re: Creating Variables Just to Pass into Subroutine?
in thread Creating Variables Just to Pass into Subroutine?

“at-a-glance readability”

Downvoted. De-faved. --; I couldn't agree less. Huh Huuurn! Repetition and deviation.

(For the pedants and forgetful: Stated and countered)


With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
I'm with torvalds on this Agile (and TDD) debunked I told'em LLVM was the way to go. But did they listen!
  • Comment on Re^2: Creating Variables Just to Pass into Subroutine?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Creating Variables Just to Pass into Subroutine?
by SuicideJunkie (Vicar) on Jul 22, 2015 at 15:18 UTC

    I'm afraid you might be suffering a chronic case of low level buzzword toxicity.

    There are good points in the core message, but the actualizing of the narrative leaves potential for process improvements.

Re^3: Creating Variables Just to Pass into Subroutine?
by Anonymous Monk on Jul 22, 2015 at 14:57 UTC
    Why? Do you recommend global variables? Do you recommend not using strict and/or warnings? Do you recommend not testing? Do you not recommend version control?

    You need to check yourself, BullyUk. This is one time when your hatred is unfounded and unwanted.

    READ FIRST!