thpfft has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:
I've studied all the relevant PAUSE documents, and the very useful perlmodstyle. Much of it is pretty fuzzy, but one issue is especially unclear, so I hope someone can clear it up.
In separate sections of the docs there are stern warnings against:</P.
And now i can't work out which is the lesser evil. I know there was some debate about this a while ago (on p5p?) but I don't know if the proper course was ever established.
The best thing seems to be to upload with the name I think it should have and then write to modules@ explaining that this is tentative and asking for feedback before making a formal namespace request. Does that sound right to you?
It's also quite hard to work out the best place for a bit of peer review. This isn't quite it, I think: 100 lines of code and 300 lines of pod aren't going to go over all that well in sopw.
So any suggestions for arenas in which to enjoy a bit of constructive humiliation would be most useful. It's an HTML:: sort of thing. Maybe. modperl list?
thanks.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: cpan etiquette
by suaveant (Parson) on Sep 20, 2001 at 23:00 UTC | |
|
Re: cpan etiquette
by Sweeper (Pilgrim) on Sep 21, 2001 at 00:42 UTC | |
by Sweeper (Pilgrim) on Sep 21, 2001 at 00:50 UTC | |
|
Re: cpan etiquette
by perrin (Chancellor) on Sep 20, 2001 at 23:07 UTC |