Re^4: Time for an application portfolio

I'll write more in a later post, but for now, it's just running as a regular CGI. :( This is probably the worst way to take advantage of Mojo; I'd love to run a long-running daemon instead, but that approach is almost certainly out of the question. :)

Alex / talexb / Toronto

Thanks PJ. We owe you so much. Groklaw -- RIP -- 2003 to 2013.

Comment on Re^4: Time for an application portfolio Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Time for an application portfolio by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Jul 29, 2015 at 21:13 UTC
If you control the server there is no reason not to go whole hog. I highly recommend uWSGI Perl support (PSGI).	[reply]
Re^6: Time for an application portfolio by talexb (Chancellor) on Jul 29, 2015 at 21:57 UTC
I don't control the whole server .. I used to be able to look at the contents of `/usr/home` but I can see that loophole has been closed. All I can fiddle with is my slice of the host. I did consider hosting this myself, but I'd rather have it somewhere it's always available, rather than somewhere a little more convenient. Part of this exercise is the implementation story. :) Update: However, now that I'm thinking about it, I might also add a link to something hosted locally that takes advantage of different technologies such as the ones your link points to. Serving up a Mojo add using CGI is a bit like having a mountain bike stuck in bottom gear. it works, but you're missing a lot of the experience. Alex / talexb / Toronto Thanks PJ. We owe you so much. Groklaw -- RIP -- 2003 to 2013.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^7: Time for an application portfolio by einhverfr (Friar) on Jul 30, 2015 at 08:25 UTC
At Efficito we don't advertise it but we do specialized hosting. You can get a full vm and we can work with you to have what you need on it. (Most of our general hosting is for Lisp sites but we can do Perl too). But I would also suggest Hub.org. They offer good plans and also tend to be pretty flexible. I used to recommend a lot of people to Hub and they are good. Bug figure it is worth noting what we can do as well.	[reply]