Re^2: Adding googleon/googleoff to portions of the right sidebar?

Why not?

It's easy to do and should only take the site maintainer a couple of minutes.

It will help users get better (more relevant) Google search results.

If you fear we will end up adding specific codes for dozens of search engines, that fear is unfounded. Google is 70% of the search market share, so adding just the code for Google we'll get most of the gain.

From what I see, the googleon/googleoff tag was introduced since 2009 so it's quite mature.

Even if Google decides to ignore the tag, the tag is a normal HTML comment tag so it won't do any rendering harm.

Comment on Re^2: Adding googleon/googleoff to portions of the right sidebar?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Adding googleon/googleoff to portions of the right sidebar? by Anonymous Monk on Jul 31, 2015 at 07:25 UTC
Why not? Because it is non-standard and specific to one search engine only -- its like tailoring html to one browser only -- not good :) It's easy to do and should only take the site maintainer a couple of minutes. While this helps, it really has never been important consideration It will help users get better (more relevant) Google search results. Very doubtful If you fear we will end up adding specific codes for dozens of search engines, that fear is unfounded. Google is 70% of the search market share, so adding just the code for Google we'll get most of the gain. Take it as political advocacy, forget google :) From what I see, the googleon/googleoff tag was introduced since 2009 so it's quite mature. googleon is fundamentally immature google has been indexing perlmonks a decade before; Super Search is even older. PerlMonks has had comments in html source that whole time. If google wanted to do something about it they had all these years. Noindex claims Googlebot doesn't support googleon/googlef , says its a feature of the hardware Google Search Appliance, in other words , google doesn't want you to add these tags to the internet Even if Google decides to ignore the tag, the tag is a normal HTML comment tag so it won't do any rendering harm. :) comments, they're supposed to help devs/maintainers, not search engines But seeing how googlebot/google will ignore them, since this feature is for owners of GooSeaApp (devs), it won't help us	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^3: Adding googleon/googleoff to portions of the right sidebar?
by Anonymous Monk on Jul 31, 2015 at 07:25 UTC

Why not?

Because it is non-standard and specific to one search engine only -- its like tailoring html to one browser only -- not good :)

It's easy to do and should only take the site maintainer a couple of minutes.

While this helps, it really has never been important consideration

It will help users get better (more relevant) Google search results.

Very doubtful

Take it as political advocacy, forget google :)

From what I see, the googleon/googleoff tag was introduced since 2009 so it's quite mature.

googleon is fundamentally immature

google has been indexing perlmonks a decade before; Super Search is even older. PerlMonks has had comments in html source that whole time. If google wanted to do something about it they had all these years.

Noindex claims Googlebot doesn't support googleon/googlef , says its a feature of the hardware Google Search Appliance, in other words , google doesn't want you to add these tags to the internet

Even if Google decides to ignore the tag, the tag is a normal HTML comment tag so it won't do any rendering harm.

:) comments, they're supposed to help devs/maintainers, not search engines

But seeing how googlebot/google will ignore them, since this feature is for owners of GooSeaApp (devs), it won't help us

[reply]