Re: Calling $function from $module

Does this help?

package fred; 
sub fred{ 
    print "This is fred::fred; so good they named me twice!" 
};;

package main; 
fred::fred;;
This is fred::fred; so good they named me twice!

$p= 'fred'; $s='fred';;

&{ "$p\:\:$s" };;
This is fred::fred; so good they named me twice!

*{ "$p\:\:$s" }->();;
This is fred::fred; so good they named me twice!
[download]

Anyone got any experience of this phone's predecessor?

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I knew I was on the right track :)

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

I'm with torvalds on this Agile (and TDD) debunked I told'em LLVM was the way to go. But did they listen!

Comment on Re: Calling $function from $module Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Calling $function from $module by Anonymous Monk on Aug 05, 2015 at 22:27 UTC
'fred::fred'->();;	[reply]
Re^3: Calling $function from $module by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Aug 05, 2015 at 22:40 UTC
And? If the OP could type `'fred::fred'->()` into his source code, then he could equally as easily type `fred::fred()` into his source code. Anyone got any experience of this phone's predecessor? With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I knew I was on the right track :) In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. I'm with torvalds on this Agile (and TDD) debunked I told'em LLVM was the way to go. But did they listen!	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: Calling $function from $module by ikegami (Patriarch) on Aug 05, 2015 at 22:43 UTC
He saying you could have used `( $p.'::'.$s )->()` [download] It's the alternate form of `&{ $p.'::'.$s }()` [download] The following should be avoided since it inherits the parent's `@_` rather than creating a new one: `&{ $p.'::'.$s }` [download] I recommend against both of your solutions. The first (`&{ $p.'::'.$s }`) is wrong and the second (`*{ $p.'::'.$s }->()`) is weird.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^5: Calling $function from $module by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Aug 05, 2015 at 23:23 UTC
Re^4: Calling $function from $module by Anonymous Monk on Aug 05, 2015 at 22:57 UTC
(my $fred = 'fred::fred' )->();	[reply]