in reply to Re^3: Spliting Table
in thread Spliting Table

As I understand it the input file has hundred of columns like this (transposed)

Columns Row 1 Row 2 ... etc for 1000s rows Index 1 2 TargetID g00000029 cg00000108 ProbeID_A 14782418 12709357 ProbeID_B 14782418 12709357 VP1.AVG_Beta 0,7469755 0,9218118 VP1.Intensity 2793 3609 VP1.Avg_NBEADS_A 15 12 VP1.Avg_NBEADS_B 15 12 VP1.BEAD_STDERR_A 3,382,405 4,474,464 VP1.BEAD_STDERR_B 7,203,749 1,550,186 VP1.Signal_A 632 190 VP1.Signal_B 2161 3419 VP1.Detection Pval 0,00 0,00 VP2.AVG_Beta 0,6678689 0,9602971 VP2.Intensity 2950 7305 VP2.Avg_NBEADS_A 18 11 VP2.Avg_NBEADS_B 18 11 VP2.BEAD_STDERR_A 9,640,222 3,527,683 VP2.BEAD_STDERR_B 1,268,078 1,308,559 VP2.Signal_A 913 194 VP2.Signal_B 2037 7111 VP2.Detection Pval 0,00 0,00 .. .. repeated for hundreds of VPs

and the OP wants to create 100's of individual files like this (but transposed)

File VP1.txt ------------ Index 1 2 ... etc for 1000s rows TargetID g00000029 cg00000108 ProbeID_A 14782418 12709357 ProbeID_B 14782418 12709357 VP1.AVG_Beta 0,7469755 0,9218118 VP1.Intensity 2793 3609 VP1.Avg_NBEADS_A 15 12 VP1.Avg_NBEADS_B 15 12 VP1.BEAD_STDERR_A 3,382,405 4,474,464 VP1.BEAD_STDERR_B 7,203,749 1,550,186 VP1.Signal_A 632 190 VP1.Signal_B 2161 3419 VP1.Detection Pval 0,00 0,00 File VP2.txt ------------ Index 1 2 ... etc for 1000s rows TargetID g00000029 cg00000108 ProbeID_A 14782418 12709357 ProbeID_B 14782418 12709357 VP2.AVG_Beta 0,6678689 0,9602971 VP2.Intensity 2950 7305 VP2.Avg_NBEADS_A 18 11 VP2.Avg_NBEADS_B 18 11 VP2.BEAD_STDERR_A 9,640,222 3,527,683 VP2.BEAD_STDERR_B 1,268,078 1,308,559 VP2.Signal_A 913 194 VP2.Signal_B 2037 7111 VP2.Detection Pval 0,00 0,00
poj

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Spliting Table
by Laurent_R (Canon) on Aug 20, 2015 at 15:59 UTC
    As I understand it the input file has hundred of columns like this (transposed)

    Maybe, but that's not what I understood from this post Re^4: Spliting Table's description of the format, which seems to indicate that there are 22 fields for each line.

    Well, this is fairly unclear to me.

        Yes, you're probably right, I had missed that post or forgotten about it.