in reply to Re^4: MCE::OrdHash naming Push and Unshift methods supporting merging and reordering (Solved)
in thread MCE::OrdHash naming Push and Unshift methods supporting merging and reordering

That all looks fine and consistent to me. I don't see Tie::IxHash as a particularly compelling driver, although I concede that using something common as a template is better than just inventing stuff. However, consistency in a name space (i.e. with MCE::Shared::Hash) is better still.

Premature optimization is the root of all job security
  • Comment on Re^5: MCE::OrdHash naming Push and Unshift methods supporting merging and reordering

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: MCE::OrdHash naming Push and Unshift methods supporting merging and reordering (Solved)
by marioroy (Prior) on Aug 21, 2015 at 13:16 UTC

    I appreciate the enlightenment given and like PushNew and UnshiftNew a lot. Thank you.

[reply]

In Section Meditations