1. I'm not english speaker of course, so, i supposed it being a noun. Now i will use array instead. Thank you for pointing out.
2. I do not know why it works for you. Can you equal do result to array, and print out the element, holding _'_ sign? (I'm not familiar w/ Data::Dumper) Should i pass my array through Dumper before using?
| [reply] |
nicolay, you must read! If you see a module used here that you don't know, look it up!!!! I don't know how much of the docs are in your native language, but I think your English is quite good enough to read most docs as the language is (supposed to be) clear and technical.
Data::Dumper is a very useful tool for development. Many problems can be solved by looking closely at the contents of your data structures and discovering what your data actually is. Data::Dumper does this.
You won't use Data::Dumper in production usually, so you don't need to "pass your array through it."
The way forward always starts with a minimal test.
| [reply]
[d/l] |
You are absolutely correct! -- Reading is my weakness/laziness, and w/ PERL documentation -- even boring -- i do not like the way they write it -- always read books on the web written other way -- for years notwithstanding always had the doc package installed w/ my «Linux» distro.
And thank you for the time spent on me! -- I really appreciate it! -- You are the one that could write books/articles on PERL!
I've looked at the module of course -- otherwise farther talk would be useless. But from quick look didn't find anything interesting to me. English wasn't a problem -- the way how info. is given is the problem. I would point you to a situation, when a doc. writer (like PERL, again), says something like, Well, you how Peter does... (here goes something that related to the Peter's saying) -- but i do not know «Peter», nor the way he «says» -- so, farther reading for me is w/ some kind of lack -- something that is always missed while reading the documentation. -- The same w/ most modules of PERL description: they are poorly organized, poorly explained, not enough (for me) examples are given, etc. -- All this «blesses» such people as i am (sure, i'm not the only one thinking the way) just to quit w/ the modules, and rather that to use already, probably, well designed and well tested code, go and write their own one -- that works, and every bit of it is easily understood, and documentation in parallel is written (to forget not in the future the ideas of a «genius» :o) ). -- Just a brief explain «why».
Because you have explained about the module and my own notices on how people use it -- I too wanted to use it, but not quickly (because of documentation again).
For now, i have solved my problem having organized my data in the file as follows:
q~\'asdasd~, q~fghfg, hfgh~
And it works perfectly. May, w/ a time i will change it all to a DB (for size of array will be great -- but again, i will have to put in array -- so...).
And thank you for your time!
| [reply] |