Re^3: Mail::CheckUser inconsistent results

Hi again Anonymous Monk.

Your output looks doubled. Did you run it twice - once with Alpha($_) uncommented and once with Omega($_) uncommented, or what?

Strangely, today when I run my one liners on my webhost I seem to be getting 100% positive (i.e. wrong) results, regardless of the domain, as long as the address syntax is correct. For example:

$ echo "a@abczz123ffz.com" | perl -MMail::CheckUser=check_email,last_check -ne 'BEGIN{$Mail::CheckUser::Skip_SMTP_Checks = 1};chomp;for $i (0..9){print "$_ -> ";if (check_email($_)){print "OK\n"}else{print last_check()->{reason}."\n"}}'
a@abczz123ffz.com -> OK
a@abczz123ffz.com -> OK
a@abczz123ffz.com -> OK
a@abczz123ffz.com -> OK
a@abczz123ffz.com -> OK
a@abczz123ffz.com -> OK
a@abczz123ffz.com -> OK
a@abczz123ffz.com -> OK
a@abczz123ffz.com -> OK
a@abczz123ffz.com -> OK

Just tried it on a different host and the results are 100% negative (i.e. correct). Any ideas? If I take this up with the webhost, what should I say?

Thanks.

Comment on Re^3: Mail::CheckUser inconsistent results

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Mail::CheckUser inconsistent results by Anonymous Monk on Aug 27, 2015 at 02:11 UTC
Your output looks doubled. Did you run it twice - once with Alpha($_) uncommented and once with Omega($_) uncommented, or what? Yes I did , its why the output is slightly different format each time Just tried it on a different host and the results are 100% negative (i.e. correct). Any ideas? Just the same ones :) Try adding this and see what you get `use Mail::CheckUser qw/ check_email last_check /; BEGIN{ $Mail::CheckUser::Skip_SMTP_Checks = 1; $Mail::CheckUser::Treat_Timeout_As_Fail = 1; $Mail::CheckUser::Debug = 1; }` [download] or maybe look inside :) look at what its doing ... so i do that and I try I get Read more... (2 kB) So this mean my local DNS server is telling me those adresses don't really exist Maybe your DNS server is lying to you , it happens, DNS hijacking	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^5: Mail::CheckUser inconsistent results by tel2 (Pilgrim) on Aug 28, 2015 at 01:51 UTC
Thanks again, Anonymous Monk! I'm looking into those things now.	[reply]