Re^2: Indirect addressing problem

Hi parv,
Do you mean that I:
- should not be using eval & symbolic references. If so, in what way am I doing that now?
- should be using eval & symbolic references instead?

Thanks.
tel2

Comment on Re^2: Indirect addressing problem

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Indirect addressing problem by Anonymous Monk on Sep 02, 2015 at 06:44 UTC
`# <= Not working!!!` is the part where you tried symbolic references... but the way its written it could only possibly work by using eval It is not a good solution, since you could simply use regular reference http://perl.plover.com/varvarname.html explains how to do it, whats wrong with it, the code is fundamentally unsafe, like smoking in bed while juggling flaming chainsaws in bed	[reply] [d/l]
Re^3: Indirect addressing problem by parv (Parson) on Sep 02, 2015 at 10:31 UTC
Below is what already had been stated in other words; feel free to ignore ... "Straight and narrow" solution had already been mentioned. My point was that if one reads up on `eval` function and what, how, why (not) of symbolic reference, then one would\|should be able to generate a solution (for "var-var" usage).	[reply] [d/l]