Re^3: No recursion depth limit?

Fifteen and counting. The reason is neatly summed up by one of the AnonymousMonkies above: Never use recursion is terrible, incurious advice. Even Don't use recursion for this problem is awful absent context, and unwelcome absent a demonstrated alternative.

Comment on Re^3: No recursion depth limit?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: No recursion depth limit? by Yary (Pilgrim) on Sep 02, 2015 at 15:46 UTC
I did like the Bathysphere anecdote, which was new to me, and took it in the spirit of "add a limit, if you're worried about recursion depth." I admit it may not have been Sun's intent! And I'm fine with everyone voting their conscience.	[reply]
Re^5: No recursion depth limit? by Anonymous Monk on Sep 02, 2015 at 16:55 UTC
In the same way that our brain's facial recognition logic falsely recognizes faces in burnt toast, your brain's programming skill is falsely attributing sensibility to S-Dial's perseveration and echolalia.	[reply]