Re^2: Is it required to map a Plack/PSGI middleware?

That's a good question. It's because at this point I'm still learning how to write my own middleware. I don't think the Perl Advent Calendar requires the use of those modules if one is merely writing one's own middleware. :) I'd appreciate your further comment. Thank you.

Comment on Re^2: Is it required to map a Plack/PSGI middleware?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Is it required to map a Plack/PSGI middleware? by Anonymous Monk on Sep 12, 2015 at 07:28 UTC
Um, read http://advent.plackperl.org/2009/12/day-23-write-your-own-middleware.html	[reply]
Re^4: Is it required to map a Plack/PSGI middleware? by tiny_monk (Sexton) on Sep 12, 2015 at 10:38 UTC
Thank you for suggesting this link. I copied a part of the Perl Advent tutorial below, "PSGI middleware behaves like a normal PSGI application but wraps the original PSGI application…” Based on this, a middleware behaves like a normal PSGI application. This means that I could also treat a middleware like a regular PSGI application and map a URL to it, using Plack::App::URLMap, just like any regular PSGI application. I guess, what I did above to run my middleware $form_validator is acceptable.	[reply]
Re^5: Is it required to map a Plack/PSGI middleware? by Anonymous Monk on Sep 12, 2015 at 21:28 UTC
Yes, it is "acceptable", there is no getting around the universal PSGI/Plack truth that everything is one sub inside another .... but still "builder" is the better way to go about it :D	[reply]
Re^6: Is it required to map a Plack/PSGI middleware? by tiny_monk (Sexton) on Sep 12, 2015 at 23:34 UTC