Re: Apache solr vs Apache Lucy

What dmitri said. I've used KinoSearch/Lucy for almost as long and can testify that the devs are the best and I know that if you find a real bug, it will be addressed quickly because it happened to me. I've never used Search::Elasticsearch but it looks like a good thing to try as well and possibly easier to work with than Lucy (its API seems a bit higher level) but I can't imagine it's as fast.

Comment on Re: Apache solr vs Apache Lucy

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Apache solr vs Apache Lucy by ppant (Acolyte) on Sep 17, 2015 at 05:07 UTC
Thanks for your feedback. have done some trials on Search::Elasticserach too. Module is working fine and looks good but was facing difficulties in making json for attachment (HTML,PDF, DOC file stored in a file system) mapper through the module (not found enough documentation). Probably I am missing something? I am using elastic 1.7 but upcoming version 2 is getting a lot of changes mainly how they index filesystem (river is deprecaited in 2.0) so probably Perl module will also get some updates also documentation.	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^2: Apache solr vs Apache Lucy
by ppant (Acolyte) on Sep 17, 2015 at 05:07 UTC

Thanks for your feedback. have done some trials on Search::Elasticserach too. Module is working fine and looks good but was facing difficulties in making json for attachment (HTML,PDF, DOC file stored in a file system) mapper through the module (not found enough documentation). Probably I am missing something? I am using elastic 1.7 but upcoming version 2 is getting a lot of changes mainly how they index filesystem (river is deprecaited in 2.0) so probably Perl module will also get some updates also documentation.

[reply]