Re: old development version of perlmonks still online

Hello LanX,

why is this branch called "inner scriptorium" but publicly readable?

Cabal only may post root nodes to this section. But fresh thought often spawns progress, so any Perl Monk may add comments to existing discussion threads within this section.

Cheers,

Athanasius <°(((>< contra mundum Iustus alius egestas vitae, eros Piratica,

Comment on Re: old development version of perlmonks still online

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: old development version of perlmonks still online by LanX (Saint) on Sep 20, 2015 at 12:37 UTC
Silly me ... I thought monkdiscuss aka PMD was meant for open discussions. .. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :) Je suis Charlie!}	[reply]
Re^3: old development version of perlmonks still online by davido (Cardinal) on Sep 20, 2015 at 18:41 UTC
At the time of its creation, Inner Scriptorium was more geared toward progress in the Monastery's code base, where PMD was more geared toward policy, wishlist suggestions, and such. So one was more technical in nature, and the other more social. Dave	[reply]
Re^4: old development version of perlmonks still online by LanX (Saint) on Sep 20, 2015 at 22:28 UTC
So there is no section for internal discussion? From my experience similar sections rather tend to be closed or joined, hard to see a future for both sections side by side. OTOH are the guts of PM so complicated and special that they deserve an internal group section. Not only to discuss sensible stuff like anti spam mechanisms but also to be protected from needless trolling. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :) Je suis Charlie!}	[reply]
Re^5: old development version of perlmonks still online by ambrus (Abbot) on Sep 21, 2015 at 08:25 UTC
Re^2: old development version of perlmonks still online by RonW (Parson) on Sep 22, 2015 at 18:13 UTC
I think LanX's question raises a valid point. Should the Inner Scriptorium be publicly readable or only by logged in monks?	[reply]
Re^3: old development version of perlmonks still online by LanX (Saint) on Sep 22, 2015 at 18:24 UTC
Logged in wasn't exactly my point. :) Those not belonging to cabal can't easily follow discussions if restricted links are posted (wiki , special nodes and so on) How should I discuss content which is considered disclosed? Besides the pmdev wiki explicitly says that discussions should be done on the inner scriptorium. I haven't seen much discussion here, and I think that's because others have the same problem. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :) Je suis Charlie!}	[reply]