Re^2: Better syntax for dynamic method on internal object ?

in reply to Re: Better syntax for dynamic method on internal object ?
in thread Better syntax for dynamic method on internal object ?

Thanks for that extravaganza.

I was trying to keep dependencies to a minimum - this needs to run on a back-level perl (<= 5.8 vintage), in a distributed set of nodes that probably will not have moose.

Thanks for the entertainment.

Software efficiency halves every 18 months, thus compensating for Moore's Law.

Comment on Re^2: Better syntax for dynamic method on internal object ?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Better syntax for dynamic method on internal object ? by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Sep 24, 2015 at 03:27 UTC
Sure, sure. Moo is not Moose and the usual even you can use the CPAN style rebukes apply. :P Not that I was intending that code to be serious. I do think the code you posted could be organized in a better way. The Moo style points to it but you know the code base so you’ll have to judge what measure is reasonable to apply.	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom