in reply to Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 16: RPerl v1.2 Kickstarter Challenge
After reading the responses that have lately accumulated on your other fund-raising thread, Will, please don’t do it again.
The mistake that you are making ... innocently and sincerely (and, technically knowledgeably) ... is more of a social than a technical one. You are asking for twenty-thousand United States Dollars, all at once. Even though Kickstarter campaigns are known (infamous?) for doing that, now and then, it is much more realistic to expect the sort of funding involvement that you have seen so far: “pay as you go.”
Kickstarter does not have most, if any, of the protections that apply to traditional large-scale fund raising: auditors, trust funds, and so on. Kickstarter has been abused. And people have learned to be prudent. They want a business plan (much more than simple milestones). They want the disbursement of funds to be clearly linked to ongoing progress, and, should the project (unlike yours ...) have a questionable chance of success, to have most of their eggs emerge unbroken. Even when success is sure, they want control. To be prudent and wise.
Do I ... does anyone ... question your technical ability, the need for the project, or its chance of success? Speaking at least for myself: n-o. But may I politely offer the following suggestions, for the good of you and this project?
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 16: RPerl v1.2 Kickstarter Challenge
by u65 (Chaplain) on Sep 28, 2015 at 12:01 UTC | |
|
Re^2: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 16: RPerl v1.2 Kickstarter Challenge
by Anonymous Monk on Sep 27, 2015 at 12:56 UTC | |
|
Re^2: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 16: RPerl v1.2 Kickstarter Challenge
by Cody Fendant (Hermit) on Sep 28, 2015 at 23:05 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Sep 29, 2015 at 06:53 UTC | |
by afoken (Chancellor) on Sep 29, 2015 at 05:13 UTC |