Re^2: call external sub ref from method in single line

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: call external sub ref from method in single line by Anonymous Monk on Oct 05, 2015 at 21:55 UTC
sundialsvc4: outgassing Laurent_R: That's a knee-jerk reaction.... What do you expect from a non-programming piece of poo? After all these years posting on perlmonks, he still can't write a valid line of perl. sundialsvc4 calls code that uses grep golfing ... hes stupid	[reply]
Re^4: call external sub ref from method in single line by 1nickt (Canon) on Oct 06, 2015 at 11:59 UTC
What a terrible post! After all this time, you still can't write a syntactically correct anonymous internet slur. 'posting on perlmonks' - Perhaps you meant 'PerlMonks,' the proper noun? 'valid line of perl' - Perhaps you meant 'Perl' the language, not 'perl' the interpreter? 'code that uses grep golfing' - Perhaps you meant 'code, which uses `grep`, "golfing"', or maybe you simply eschew punctuation at unpredictable moments. Stack overload inside your cranium? 'hes stupid' - Perhaps you meant 'he's stupid.'? 'a non-programming piece of poo' - Perhaps you meant to say that the Monk in question has no redemptive value because 'he still can't write a valid line of perl' (an overstated assertion and a hyperbolic conclusion even if you were trying to be mean)? If so, perhaps you should consider your linguistic shortcomings in your native language that you so succinctly have placed on display here. The way forward always starts with a minimal test.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^5: call external sub ref from method in single line by Anonymous Monk on Oct 11, 2015 at 23:53 UTC
1nickt: What a terrible post! After all this time, you still can't write a syntactically correct anonymous internet slur. ... your native language So you "made" the sundialsvc4? My mind just exploded	[reply]