in reply to Re: A thought-provoking external article about abusive web-sites
in thread A thought-provoking external article about abusive web-sites

Whenever the gods or janitors see blatant ad-hominem, abuse or even snide remarks that have nothing to do with the thread it's located in, it's swiftly considered and removed.

Citings please. I believe your understanding of our moderation system is mistaken.

I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.
  • Comment on Re^2: A thought-provoking external article about abusive web-sites

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: A thought-provoking external article about abusive web-sites
by stevieb (Canon) on Oct 23, 2015 at 18:50 UTC

    I'll rephrase... 'When anyone sees ... it's *most often* swiftly considered, *voted on by the community*, and removed *via the automated reaping process*.'

    I started off saying one thing and went sideways.

[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion