Re: Style question: symref or eval?

Why do you have to turn of strict refs when using a sub-ref? I've never had to...

Assuming the people maintaining your code know references, a sub-ref is what I'd reccomend as being clearer and easier to maintain.

------
We are the carpenters and bricklayers of the Information Age.

Don't go borrowing trouble. For programmers, this means Worry only about what you need to implement.

Comment on Re: Style question: symref or eval?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Style question: symref or eval? by suaveant (Parson) on Sep 25, 2001 at 21:02 UTC
I think he is using a string... not a ref to a sub... Update - yeah `# Suppose $op is the name of the sub,` [download] - Ant - Some of my best work - Fish Dinner	[reply] [d/l]
Re: Re: Re: Style question: symref or eval? by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Sep 25, 2001 at 21:04 UTC
Duh! I thought $op was a hashref of subrefs. smacks forehead Listen to suaveant ... he said what I was trying to say. ;-) ------ We are the carpenters and bricklayers of the Information Age. Don't go borrowing trouble. For programmers, this means Worry only about what you need to implement.	[reply]