Re: [SOLVED] Return statement in subroutine(s) is necessary when not returning anything?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: [SOLVED] Return statement in subroutine(s) is necessary when not returning anything? by Preceptor (Deacon) on Nov 03, 2015 at 14:37 UTC
Well, whilst I hesitate to say it, there are a few places where perl lets people get away with shoddy coding practices...	[reply]
Re^3: [SOLVED] Return statement in subroutine(s) is necessary when not returning anything? by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Nov 03, 2015 at 15:09 UTC
I disagree. A large part of my affection for Perl is its terseness. It doesn't force you to do things that are obvious enough for the compiler so obvious enough for a good dev. Verbosity can be an impediment to communication; especially in technical matters. Back to the OP's example– `sub ohai { print "OHAI"; return; }` That is technically "wrong." It prevents you from being able to use the sub like this `do_something() if ohai();` It makes the sub less useful (Update: and harder to test). To fix that, you would report on success. That RFC:SHOULD look like: `sub ohai { return print "ohai"; }` [download] How good a practice does that appear to be? Looks foolish to me. I much prefer the implicit `return` (when it's sensible, it's not always) than the explicit being recommended.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^3: [SOLVED] Return statement in subroutine(s) is necessary when not returning anything? by ikegami (Patriarch) on Nov 03, 2015 at 16:27 UTC
I didn't say a few people don't use the practice. In fact, I don't think I've come across any CPAN code that uses the practice. Claims of shoddiness seem to be greatly exaggerated.	[reply]
Re^4: [SOLVED] Return statement in subroutine(s) is necessary when not returning anything? by Preceptor (Deacon) on Nov 06, 2015 at 12:05 UTC
Indeed. But my point was just because a lot of people do something, really doesn't have any bearing on it being a good - or bad - practice. Argumentum ad populum Especially in perl, which lets you get away with all sorts of horrific nastiness for extended periods of time.	[reply]
Re^5: [SOLVED] Return statement in subroutine(s) is necessary when not returning anything? by ikegami (Patriarch) on Nov 06, 2015 at 18:55 UTC
Re^5: [SOLVED] Return statement in subroutine(s) is necessary when not returning anything? by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Nov 06, 2015 at 13:28 UTC
Re^2: [SOLVED] Return statement in subroutine(s) is necessary when not returning anything? by Anonymous Monk on Nov 06, 2015 at 23:52 UTC
If it's true that the trailing return; is better, why does practically noone use it? Hmm, 860 distributions use it :) http://grep.cpan.me/?q=return%3B&page=35	[reply]