in reply to Re^2: A better implementation of LCSS?
in thread A better implementation of LCSS?

Good point. When I first read through the POD, I mistakenly thought the terms "substring" and "subsequence" were synonymous. After playing around with the *::LCS modules, I realized there is a huge distinction between the terms. Perhaps the module author was under the same misconception. I agree with you that the Algorithm::LCSS POD should be clarified. UPDATE: I see you've logged a bug report.