SSH and Perl

ralph2014 has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: SSH and Perl by marto (Cardinal) on Dec 19, 2015 at 11:11 UTC
Yes, salva is an expert in all things ssh, and he has already given you good advice. There's no need to vent your frustrations here.	[reply]
Re: SSH and Perl by Anonymous Monk on Dec 19, 2015 at 11:00 UTC
Morning Some good info here it seems on perl and SSH. does this seem accurate to you guys? https://github.com/salva/perl-and-ssh Sure why not? consider that salva is salva is salva... so he is one of the guys :) and having written the info considers it good	[reply]
Re^2: SSH and Perl by ralph2014 (Initiate) on Dec 19, 2015 at 11:44 UTC
ha ha yeh well worth a read, much clearer now. sorry about the venting..........	[reply]
Re: SSH and Perl by karlgoethebier (Abbot) on Dec 19, 2015 at 12:10 UTC
"...does this seem accurate to you guys?" Sure. But may i ask why you ask? Regards, Karl ŤThe Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostropheť	[reply]
Re^2: SSH and Perl by ralph2014 (Initiate) on Dec 19, 2015 at 12:29 UTC
i didnt realise is was salva on here when i first posted it. I just think this is a useful page for those who come here with SSH in mind.	[reply]
Re^3: SSH and Perl by marto (Cardinal) on Dec 19, 2015 at 12:32 UTC
It's bad form to alter the content of your post without marking the changes, especially since people have already responded and you've deleted the context. This is touched on here (among other places): Don't ever wipe the original content of any node you've written, even if you've solved your problem; you're clarifying your issue; or you realize you just made a "D'oh!" Mark the changed/new content with the word "Update." Don't delete! Doing so is likely to make replies you've received unintelligble to future readers. Use `<strike> ... </strike>` if you must.	[reply] [d/l]
Re: SSH and Perl by u65 (Chaplain) on Dec 19, 2015 at 12:05 UTC
https://github.com/salva/perl-and-ssh	[reply]