Re: XML::Simple needs to go!

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: XML::Simple needs to go! by Preceptor (Deacon) on Dec 22, 2015 at 10:48 UTC
So does XML::Twig - it even maintains backwards compatibility thanks to `simplify`	[reply] [d/l]
Re^3: XML::Simple needs to go! by Jenda (Abbot) on Jan 05, 2016 at 23:37 UTC
You could say the same about XML::Rules and inferRulesFromExample/inferRulesFromDTD. One of those will give you a bunch of rules that'll instruct XML::Rules to produce a datastructure equivalent to a well set XML::Simple. Jenda Enoch was right! Enjoy the last years of Rome.	[reply]