Re: Which email module should I use

I recommend MIME::Lite. It works fairly well on Windows and it can handle attachments. I don't need much more and the message in its documentation at the top stating that you should use something else is greatly exaggerated in my opinion.

Comment on Re: Which email module should I use

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Which email module should I use by JGNI (Novice) on Dec 23, 2015 at 11:21 UTC
I normally use MIME::Lite, but was wondering if there was a better module without a don't use message out there Need localization then try Locale::CLDR on CPAN	[reply]
Re^3: Which email module should I use by afoken (Chancellor) on Dec 23, 2015 at 12:05 UTC
better module Please define "better". More features than MIME::Lite? Less code required? More documentation? Clearer API? No C compiler required? Support for 20+ operating systems? CPAN has Email::Sender, Email::Send (also with a "do not use" notice), Email::Stuff ("don't use"), Email::Stuffer, Email::Postman, Mail::DWIM, Mail::Send, Mail::SendEasy, Mail::Sender, and many more. Alexander -- Today I will gladly share my knowledge and experience, for there are no sweeter words than "I told you so". ;-)	[reply]
Re^4: Which email module should I use by JGNI (Novice) on Dec 23, 2015 at 12:49 UTC
Better is currently defined as 'does not have a big warning from it's author that you really should be using something else'. The rest is implementation details. Failing that, as pointed out above, which modules do people use ignoring the warnings. Need localization then try Locale::CLDR on CPAN	[reply]