Re^2: ... for (@

Yes, firstly, I wanted so for an output, but later I found that behaviours are interesting with using 'x=' operator :) . I experimented if I can multiply the array in 'for' sentence with using 'x='.

Comment on Re^2: ... for (@_) x= 2;

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: ... for (@_) x= 2; by jeffa (Bishop) on Dec 28, 2015 at 22:00 UTC
Just in case this is not obvious, map tends to produce a more consistent solution in these situations: `perl -le'print map $_ x=2, ("a" .. "f")'` [download] jeffa L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L-- -R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B-- H---H---H---H---H---H--- (the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)	[reply] [d/l]