Re^4: ... for (@_) x= 2; (scalar assignment)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: ... for (@_) x= 2; (scalar assignment) by LanX (Saint) on Dec 29, 2015 at 14:20 UTC
> I tried compare three of my codes sorry? > `x=` seems doing the same in all three cases - it asks `@_` to be a scalar. which is correct and documented. Anyway it might be an implementation flow that you sometimes don't get a warning or compilation error, but not a very serious one. I don't see the point discussing it further, since you have plenty of possibilities to achieve your goal in a much saner way. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :) Je suis Charlie!}	[reply] [d/l] [select]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^5: ... for (@_) x= 2; (scalar assignment)
by LanX (Saint) on Dec 29, 2015 at 14:20 UTC

> I tried compare three of my codes

sorry?

> x= seems doing the same in all three cases - it asks @_ to be a scalar.

which is correct and documented.

Anyway it might be an implementation flow that you sometimes don't get a warning or compilation error, but not a very serious one.

I don't see the point discussing it further, since you have plenty of possibilities to achieve your goal in a much saner way.

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)

Je suis Charlie!}