in reply to Do a named regex group in 5.8?

The (?{}) and (??{}) constructs are available for use in perl5.8, but you'd have to ask yourself if such ugliness is really worth it: 

$ perl -MData::Dumper -e 'q(abc de f abcdef) =~ m/(?<x>\w{3}).*\k<x>/ 
+and print Dumper {%+};'
$ perl5.8.8 -MData::Dumper -e 'q(abc de f abcdef) =~ m/(?{$+{x} = pos}
+)(\w{3})(?{$+{x} = substr($_, $+{x}, -$+{x}+pos)}).*(??{$+{x}})/ and 
+print Dumper {%+};'

[download]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Do a named regex group in 5.8?
by AnomalousMonk (Archbishop) on Feb 09, 2016 at 07:37 UTC

    This can be made slightly less ugly by 

    c:\@Work\Perl>perl -wMstrict -le
"use Data::Dumper qw(Dumper);
 ;;
 print qq{perl version $]};
 ;;
 q(abc de f abcdef) =~ m/
   ( (\w{3}) (?{ $+{x} = $^N; }) .* (??{ $+{x}; }) )
   /x and print qq{\$1 '$1' \n}, Dumper \%+;
"
perl version 5.008009
$1 'abc de f abc'
$VAR1 = {
          'x' => 'abc'
        };

    [download]
    if it's really necessary to have named backreferences in the regex via a hash.

    Otherwise, I'm not sure I see its advantage over something like 

    c:\@Work\Perl>perl -wMstrict -le
"print qq{perl version $]};
 ;;
 q(abc de f abcdef) =~ m/
   ( (\w{3}) .* \2 )
   /x and print qq{\$1 '$1'};
"
perl version 5.008009
$1 'abc de f abc'

    [download]
    or perhaps like 
    c:\@Work\Perl>perl -wMstrict -le
"print qq{perl version $]};
 ;;
 my $match = my ($whole, $first_part) = q(abc de f abcdef) =~ m/
   ( (\w{3}) .* \2 )
   /x
 ;;
 print qq{first part '$first_part'  whole '$whole'} if $match;
"
perl version 5.008009
first part 'abc'  whole 'abc de f abc'

    [download]

    Give a man a fish:  <%-{-{-{-<

[reply]
[d/l]
[select]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom