elfpen has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:
Greetings and humble thanksgiving in advance of your excellent advice.
Every few years I must expiate for my sin of invoking Math::BigNum in an important script by wrestling again with the install of Math::Peri.
This time around I am on an HP-UX v11.31 Itanium box. And all seems to be so close to right. But one test.
t/55_intnum.t
# eval: sumnum($n,1,[2,log(2)], sub{2**(-$n)},intnumstep()+1,1)-1 not ok 46 # in='sumnum($n,1,[2,log(2)], sub{2**(-$n)},intnumstep()+1,1 +)-1', err='PARI: *** the PARI stack overflows ! current stack size: 20000000 (19.073 Mbytes) [hint] you can increase GP stack with allocatemem() '
I don't know if this is a terrible thing or an ignorable thing or somewhere in between.
In the end, Math-Pari-2.010808 declares FAIL and am dejected and downcast.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Math::Peri test: FAIL but hari-kari not an option
by syphilis (Archbishop) on Feb 18, 2016 at 23:18 UTC |