in reply to Re^5: On silently moving posts (judicial activism)
in thread On silently moving posts

I might opt to correct this guidelines, but in reality there are far too many to be read...

Narrowing the guidelines after a decade and a half is not cool :D

  • Comment on Re^6: On silently moving posts (judicial activism)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: On silently moving posts (judicial activism)
by LanX (Saint) on Feb 24, 2016 at 01:28 UTC
    I'm pretty sure they grew over time, like the internet did.

    I'm here for 8 years now and am still discovering "new" official stuff

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
    Je suis Charlie!

      :) "cool" has been about "cool" since the beginning, snippets.. were incorporated into the section, but the "cool" part didn't get cut out -- you don't cut the root , it lives in the name
Re^7: On silently moving posts (judicial activism)
by jdporter (Paladin) on Feb 24, 2016 at 13:04 UTC

    LanX didn't say narrow, he said correct. To the contrary, in fact, he implied enlarge

      Well, I think beech is mainly preoccupied with "coolness" ...

      ... YMMV!

      Cheers Rolf
      (addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
      Je suis Charlie!

        beech is mainly preoccupied with "coolness"

        Indeed, it appears that way. But I would caution/advise every monk that the section titles are not reliable guides, and this shouldn't be surprising given the origins of the site. :-)