Re: Moo[se] namespace weirdness with conditionally composed-in Roles (two roles with the same name, with alias)

So you're wanting to have the role have the same name but be from different classes?

You want one role to override another?

update: https://metacpan.org/pod/distribution/Moose/lib/Moose/Manual/Roles.pod#METHOD-EXCLUSION-AND-ALIASING

  with 'Breakable'   => { -alias => { break => 'break_bone' } },
       'Breakdancer' => { -alias => { break => 'break_dance' } };
[download]

Now does Moo/Moo::Role or Role::Tiny support alias for with?

Comment on Re: Moo[se] namespace weirdness with conditionally composed-in Roles (two roles with the same name, with alias) Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Moo[se] namespace weirdness with conditionally composed-in Roles (two roles with the same name, with alias) by 1nickt (Canon) on Mar 21, 2016 at 08:25 UTC
Thank you for your reply. That's not what I am attempting though: I want to load only one Role, based on a condition. The way forward always starts with a minimal test.	[reply]
Re^2: Moo[se] namespace weirdness with conditionally composed-in Roles (two roles with the same name, with alias) by Anonymous Monk on Mar 21, 2016 at 07:49 UTC
Naturally adding `with 'Odd', 'Even';` yields `Due to a method name conflict between roles 'Even and Odd', the method 'bar' must be implemented by 'MyClass'` :)	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^3: Moo[se] namespace weirdness with conditionally composed-in Roles (two roles with the same name, with alias) by 1nickt (Canon) on Mar 21, 2016 at 08:23 UTC
Right. I'm not trying to load more than one Role with a method of the same name, though. I want to load one or the other and have the parent execute the loaded module's methods when called. Looks like I can get what I want with `apply_roles_to_object()` so long as I am willing to accept the Roles overwriting the parent's methods in case of conflict (which is the opposite of a Role as far as I know, but I can live with it). Thanks for your reply. The way forward always starts with a minimal test.	[reply] [d/l]