Re^3: List vs array printing in perl

my script template begins with

use 5.011; # implies strict + feature 'say'
use warnings;
[download]

but that doesn't help with a one-liner. There he could use

perl -wMstrict -e ...
[download]

(that goes without saying, though)

Comment on Re^3: List vs array printing in perl Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: List vs array printing in perl by ikegami (Patriarch) on Apr 01, 2016 at 15:48 UTC
"Similarly, if the specified Perl version is greater than or equal to 5.12.0, strictures are enabled lexically as with use strict . " According to the documentation, you need `use 5.012;`.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^5: List vs array printing in perl by hippo (Archbishop) on Apr 01, 2016 at 15:54 UTC
The docs may be right, but 5.011 works for me (on 5.20): `$ cat xxx.pl #!/usr/bin/env perl use 5.011; use warnings; $x = 1; $ ./xxx.pl Global symbol "$x" requires explicit package name at ./xxx.pl line 5. Execution of ./xxx.pl aborted due to compilation errors.` [download] That said, I see no great advantage to having a non-stable-release version as the minimum requirement, especially such an old one. YMMV.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^6: List vs array printing in perl by ikegami (Patriarch) on Apr 01, 2016 at 16:06 UTC
I see. It's probably documented that way because 5.11 (and other odd version since 5.6) is a version put out for testing, not for use. Or maybe it didn't work in 5.11.0.	[reply]
Re^6: List vs array printing in perl by soonix (Chancellor) on Apr 20, 2016 at 20:21 UTC
when I set up my template, I wanted to specify the lowest possible version implying `strict`. Didn't think about non-stable vs. stable. (and the lowest I'm using effectively is 5.14, anyway)	[reply] [d/l]