in reply to Re^5: unreaping , reversing reaped, resurrecting a node
in thread unreaping , reversing reaped, resurrecting a node

We didn't destroy content.

The guy who asked the question cannot see the response , doesn't know a response is missing, what do you call that?

  • Comment on Re^6: unreaping , reversing reaped, resurrecting a node

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: unreaping , reversing reaped, resurrecting a node
by LanX (Saint) on May 06, 2016 at 00:27 UTC
Re^7: unreaping , reversing reaped, resurrecting a node
by jdporter (Paladin) on Nov 13, 2023 at 14:16 UTC
    The guy who asked the question cannot see the response , doesn't know a response is missing

    The "guy" who "asked the question" never bothered to check back here for a response, as far as anyone can tell. If it had been you (and it could have been you, given that you have done almost all your posting anonymously for years now), you would have responded with some kind of complaint about your "content" being "destroyed" "for no reason". (It's not lost on me that that is exactly what you're doing in the OP. Nonetheless, I don't think you posted that junk, because you know how this site works, and you were posting as yourself mostly back in those days.)