in reply to Do subroutine variables get destroyed?
As a demo, I re-wrote your a1 sub and added an a2 sub.
Rather than assigning the hash reference in the subroutine to the "global" variable, I would recommend returning the hash reference from the sub as shown in recoded sub a1.
Like in C, it is possible to pass a "pointer", the hash reference to a sub as shown in sub a2. The memory previously used by sub a1 is "re-used", same struct is modified. If "my $href" goes out of lexical scope, its memory will be recovered and reused by Perl.
#!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use warnings; use Data::Dumper; # a cool core module # that dumps any structure my $href = a1(); #hash reference returned from sub print "v1=$href->{'v1'}\n"; #dot operator not needed print Dumper $href; a2($href); print Dumper $href; exit(0); sub a1 { my %hash; $hash{v1} = 10; $hash{v2} = 20; return \%hash; # %hash memory will "live" due to # reference counting } sub a2 { my ($href) = @_; $href -> {v1} = 30; #quotes are ok but not needed $href -> {'v2'} = 40; return; } __END__ v1=10 $VAR1 = { 'v2' => 20, 'v1' => 10 }; $VAR1 = { 'v2' => 40, 'v1' => 30 };
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: Do subroutine variables get destroyed?
by bt101 (Acolyte) on May 08, 2016 at 16:00 UTC | |
by AnomalousMonk (Archbishop) on May 08, 2016 at 16:08 UTC | |
by GrandFather (Saint) on May 08, 2016 at 21:19 UTC | |
by Marshall (Canon) on May 09, 2016 at 22:10 UTC |