in reply to Re: Querying Saints in our Book (2)
in thread Querying Saints in our Book (2)

He was excluded from the beginning, as his numbers really mess up the average.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Querying Saints in our Book (2)
by LanX (Saint) on May 17, 2016 at 14:52 UTC
    ahhh ... *_X are the corrected numbers .... got it.

    You might be interested in Median and other techniques to eliminate outliers.

    You could even cluster different user types ( "voters" vs "posters" )

    Personally I'd like to see a XP per response level stat ( Re^n: ), but accessing the DB is outside of your possibilities.

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
    Je suis Charlie!

      Sure, using median might help, as would grouping. Any suggestions as to the criteria? :)

      I'd like to see a XP per response level stat ( Re^n: ), but accessing the DB is outside of your possibilities.

      Yeah, if only i had db access. It'd be fun to write and run all those queries.

        Well you can work around it...

        ... you can easily order a monks writeups by reputation.

        And if you cast votes at certain thresholds (like quantiles) you can even tell the vote range and calculate a statistically solid estimation.

        But I wouldn't expect tye to be too happy if you do this automatically and at large scale ;)

        update

        e.g. after ordering your 863 posts best first and voting in a logarithmic scale I see

        Rank Votes 430 5 215 8 107 13 53 18 26 21 13 26 7 30

        you are deciphered my friend ;-)

        Cheers Rolf
        (addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
        Je suis Charlie!