in reply to Re^4: What am I not understanding about $,
in thread What am I not understanding about $,

Thanks for taking the time to point me to the other post.

Again, anyway, I tended to read Ovid's suggestion in the light of robustness (where it seems to be adequate) instead of readabiliy, that's why I went down at the microscopic level. I understand that after reading too many suggestions like these you might snap though :)

perl -ple'$_=reverse' <<<ti.xittelop@oivalf

Io ho capito... ma tu che hai detto?
  • Comment on Re^5: What am I not understanding about $,