No, it isn't exactly the same question. However it is a similar and related question. Given the number of answers to your various questions in the other thread and the apparent situation that you don't seem to have been able to apply the knowledge learned there to this question, there's no point in us continuing to answer similar, related questions ad infinitum.
The point of the Monastery is education. If you aren't learning then there's no point teaching. Do read the Data Structures Cookbook. If you subsequently have problems or do not understand something written in the Cookbook then by all means ask.
| [reply] |
As i told , i'm beginner .
I began Perl since less 3 months. And my objective is to improve my level. So my apologizes for all if sometime i ask almost same questions, as you say, and it's true.
But if it seems for your to be repetitive question, for me , it's a way to understand the differences between codes as the case may be. That's why i try to explain correctly my issues here.
I understand your point of view and i try to be better. Thanks again for your support anyway and especially for your reply. And if there is a thing i appreciate in Perl : the Community ,which is not very great but very helpful.
Concerning your link, it's pretty good! But there aren't a lot of concret case , with some examples.
*****Lost in translation****TIMTOWTOI****
| [reply] |
Start with smaller examples to become more familiar with data structures, then grow into the larger ones. perldsc like hippo said is a very good start.
There are also very detailed guides all over the net for maintaining Perl data structures. I wrote a guide to references a few years ago that may help.
One book that I read numerous times (and I reference in my above link) that helped me tremendously which is *well* worth the money is Randal Schwartz's (aka. merlyn) Learning Perl Objects, References and Modules. It's very old, but still very relevant. Considering that I try to make as much of my code as possible compliant back to v5.8, the examples in the book are not much (if at all) different from the techniques still in use today.
| [reply] |