in reply to Re: unintentional conversion of signaling NaN to quiet NaN
in thread unintentional conversion of signaling NaN to quiet NaN

Uh-huh. As my module is focused on non-exceptioned data, and my eyes are glossed over enough as it is by your quoted paragraph, I think I'll avoid delving much deeper. :-) But it is good to know that I'm not just making a silly mistake in my translation mechanism. Thanks.

  • Comment on Re^2: unintentional conversion of signaling NaN to quiet NaN