in reply to Re: Re: Re: Apocalypse 3
in thread Apocalypse 3
That will depend on how the Perl 6 parser works. If it pre-tokenizes (like Perl 5 does) then we shall almost certainly still have a "longest interpretation possible" tokenizing rule. So:
$x = $y //foo/;
will have to be interpreted as:
$x = $y // foo/;
But if (as I hope) we tokenize on-the-fly, then the parser will be able to backtrack this incorrect interpretation and re-parse it as:
$x = $y / /foo/;
instead.
Indeed, if that is the parsing strategy, the issue here would never even arise, since the higher precedence of / over // would see that interpretation considered first. (Of course, there would be backtracking when compiling:
$x = $y //foo;
in that case, since the higher precedence interpretation doesn't work.)
Personally, I think JIT tokenization will be the only feasible approach for Perl 6, given how mutable the language will be (e.g. user-defined operators).
And, almost as a happy by-product, that is likely to inject the maximum degree of DWIMity into the language.
Damian
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Apocalypse 3
by japhy (Canon) on Oct 04, 2001 at 18:26 UTC | |
by TheDamian (Vicar) on Oct 05, 2001 at 12:03 UTC |