in reply to (OT) The Stupid Leading the Blind, or Is It Just Me?

There's a high chance that Symantec are pissy because they have no market share for Unix and no chance of getting one. They won't get a market because the built in Unix securty is good enough. (Note that the Windows NT line would be more secure than Unix if people would just stop logging in as Administrator).

But you can bet there will be a Symantec SafeGuard for .NET (TM) or some garbage like that. Mono won't need it because most GNU programmers are raving paranoiacs who build security in from the word go. MS likes to leave a few security holes in for future upgrade releases.

So in a way Chien is absolutely correct. The GNU programmers won't be following standards when it comes to securing your data - they will be exceeding them.

I could, and possibly should spend the rest of this post bashing the computer press who seem to be less sophisticated than their readers, but it's breakfast time.

____________________
Jeremy
I didn't believe in evil until I dated it.

  • Comment on Re: (OT) The Stupid Leading the Blind, or Is It Just Me?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: (OT) The Stupid Leading the Blind, or Is It Just Me?
by hans_moleman (Beadle) on Oct 06, 2001 at 09:15 UTC
    moving more OT, I know, but I think people would stop logging in as administrator in the NT world if there was a convenient way to change the current user context...
Re^2: (OT) The Stupid Leading the Blind, or Is It Just Me?
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Oct 08, 2001 at 12:15 UTC
    The concept of NT may be potentially more secure than that of Unix - but with all the bugs in the code? There have been so many exploits to remotely become Admin on an NT box it isn't funny.