in reply to Re^2: Update the GUI
in thread Update the GUI

Help for Display Settings

Theme Configuration

The appearance of the PerlMonks site can be changed by choosing from one of several themes . You can stay with the default or pick a specialized theme. The dark theme exists for the people who prefer light text on dark backgrounds. Choosing a theme other than the default makes it easy to remember if you are logged in or not. "Monk pictures off" turns off the random monk picture in the top right corner of every page, while "Monk quips off" turns off the pithy quotes on the top left. Stylesheet Settings

In addition to the themes above, you can alter the appearance of the PerlMonks site with your own custom CSS stylesheets.

> 3)"Tables for layouts are a legacy method that should not be used any more. Layouts utilizing div blocks, and in the near future, CSS3 Multi-column Layout or CSS3 Flexible Box Layout, should be used instead."

Display Settings

  • Lay out nodelets as <div> instead of <table> ?
  • Lay out main content as <div> instead of <table> ?
  • Lay out threads as <div> instead of <table> ?
  • > Tons of lots of talks about it ...

    It's obvious that we have to stay somehow backwards compatible to

    That's called legacy ...

    So what's the appropriate reply to your critic?

    please choose two or more!

    > and no action.

    TobyInk acted, I acted, others acted.

    There are already plenty of interfaces and possibilities "to act".

    > If they have waited this long they do not care, so why bother.ッ

    Well did you act yet?

    Provide a migration concept which doesn't kill backwards compatibility and a suggest a better design as default theme, please.

    I've just shown you all some open APIs to do so.

    And please read some of these "talks about it".

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
    Je suis Charlie!

    Replies are listed 'Best First'.
    Re^4: Update the GUI (toolkit)
    by $h4X4_&#124;=73}{ (Monk) on Jul 21, 2016 at 02:37 UTC

      42 Errors, 91 warning(s)

      What the people are doing 16 years later is using XHTML/HTML5 in a site that has a HTML 4.01 document type.
      The legacy support you claim looks like it would break for some people if that keeps up.

      That is one reason why people started to use BBcode 17 years ago, post would be portable to HTML changes and it would be harder for people to misuse HTML.

      But If I listened to you. Then everything is all good and I'm dumb.

      ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

        Upvoted for the validator link!

        Still "Provide a migration concept which doesn't kill backwards compatibility and suggest a better design as default theme, please"

        Cheers Rolf
        (addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
        Je suis Charlie!

          I suggest that PM ask for help in SOPW for solutions to the backwards compatibility issues that they face.
          Because if PM wants to keep its backwards compatibility issues a secret then there will be no work done to improve it.

          I am currently rewriting my own web framework/CMS, so I don't have programming restraints that prevent the code from moving on with life. The only thing that was holding it back was the theme design but that's fixed with new and better capability's.

          I would not do any work on this site till the owner agrees to use BBcode in it. Do you think they would agree to that?