in reply to Re^15: Switch
in thread Switch

Absolutly. The ratings service, or rather it's intended target audience (as described above) would benefit greatly from your expertise.

You really think so? You think that the authors of Moose or Perlcritic or Readonly or autobox et al would appreciate me posting my views on their modules as reviews?

I don't.

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I knew I was on the right track :)
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^17: Switch
by marto (Cardinal) on Aug 07, 2016 at 20:41 UTC

    From the perspective of cpan ratings, as discussed I'm more concerned about the novice/casual user, those who do not have the time or experience to delve into the source code and pull things apart, essentially, those who can't make an informed decision due to lack of time or ability. You display great technical ability and very often go to great lengths to help people. Reviews aren't arguments, or even conversations. I appreciate that trying to work with others to improve something you feel requires attention can be difficult, but this all depends on the people involved. That said, sometimes we reach an impasse, and it's time to walk away, or just stop.

    Back to cpan ratings, with all due respect, if you applied your expertise while sticking to the technical issue at hand your input would be very valuable IMHO.

    Perl has a great community, we all pitch in and call each other out when required.

[reply]
[reply]

In Section Module Reviews