Re^4: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they?

Oops sorry -- I took not displaying correctly as not working to display the character.

I should have said they displayed correctly for me.

Does your browser have a UTF-8 fallback mode?
I'm using Pale Moon, a 64-bit FF derivative that is more like old-FF then current versions are.

Comment on Re^4: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? by kcott (Archbishop) on Sep 15, 2016 at 20:02 UTC
"Does your browser have a UTF-8 fallback mode?" Yes. — Ken	[reply]
Re^6: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? by perl-diddler (Chaplain) on Sep 18, 2016 at 08:52 UTC
That all of the examples display correctly seems to lend credence to the idea that PM could be UTF-8 friendly if it wanted to be. Sorry if I misread something (again!)... ;-) Is there some reason why it couldn't be changed? Is anyone around with the ability to make edits to the website's source? Or do PM caretakers pay attention to discussions here on "PM's Discussion"? pout 😡 Or is this not the place to discuss issues about the PM website? wide-eye, puzzled look 😁. Hmmm...yep, I'd say the site can display UTF-8, except in code blocks...if that isn't a bug...😁 𝓓𝓲𝓭𝓭𝓵𝓮	[reply]