Re^4: What's the perl5's future?

That would explain why hordes of programmers have flocked to contribute to cperl. Oh wait, no they haven't.

Ah, the important part of the message, labeling people because you're mad at their technical points

It doesn't take much to prove you wrong, see for yourself https://github.com/perl11, there is more than one "People" on the project

Comment on Re^4: What's the perl5's future?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: What's the perl5's future? by dave_the_m (Monsignor) on Sep 18, 2016 at 21:00 UTC
Ah, the important part of the message, labeling people because you're mad at their technical points No, I pointed out that the thesis that p5p was driving away contributors, and that they would therefore gather around cperl, was incorrect. There was no labelling in that statement, nor any demonstration that I'm mad at anyone's technical points. it doesn't take much to prove you wrong, see for yourself https://github.com/perl11, there is more than one "People" on the project https://github.com/perl11/cperl/network/members shows a total of 4 members. And almost all the commits to cperl are authored by you. It's still essentially your personal project. But I'm not going to argue further with you; I explained in this thread from a year ago why it was pointless engaging you in further debate. Good bye Dave.	[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.