in reply to Re (tilly) 2: Comprehending Binary :=
in thread Comprehending Binary :=
Which just doesn't seem right, I have to be missing something.
So how is $bound := %data{$key} different from $bound = \%data{$key} aside from the latter being a reference? (And since we'll have automatic dereferencing to the expected context, that shouldn't be a problem, correct?)
I now see that = still slurps, so (@a, @b) := (@b, @a) isn't easily reproduceable, and thus we have a clear use for :=....but is that really the extent of it?
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: Re (tilly) 2: Comprehending Binary :=
by TheDamian (Vicar) on Oct 08, 2001 at 07:37 UTC | |
|
Re: Re: Re (tilly) 2: Comprehending Binary :=
by TheDamian (Vicar) on Oct 08, 2001 at 07:24 UTC | |
by MeowChow (Vicar) on Oct 08, 2001 at 07:58 UTC | |
by TheDamian (Vicar) on Oct 08, 2001 at 08:06 UTC | |
by MeowChow (Vicar) on Oct 08, 2001 at 08:16 UTC | |
by chromatic (Archbishop) on Oct 08, 2001 at 08:54 UTC | |
| |
|
Re (tilly) 4: Comprehending Binary :=
by tilly (Archbishop) on Oct 07, 2001 at 22:14 UTC |