in reply to Re^2: Understanding a OOP Code: Package declared within a Package
in thread Understanding a OOP Code: Package declared within a Package

The same basics apply.

The number of elements in the name doesn't matter, it is still just a name.

Any 'relationship' between packages with the same prefix is implied -- for human consumption only -- they are entirely independent as far as Perl is concerned.

Those packages with the statement use Base (X::Y::Z) at the top, are subclasses of the named package, which does define an OO relationship between them, such that the subclassing package (those with use Base ...), inherit (or overide) all the code (functions/methods) from the named base package.

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I knew I was on the right track :)
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom